• Normal colour scheme
  • Dyslexia colour scheme
  • High visual colour scheme

My introduction to the Olympic Park

Olivia, ODA Sustainability Advisor, 18 Aug 2008

Last week, a mere eight days into my time as Sustainability Advisor at the Olympic Delivery Authority, I boarded a bus outside the shiny facade of Churchill Place, and headed for a tour of the infamous Olympic Park site.

Despite having been bombarded with numerous facts and figures pertaining to the Park, nothing else could have really given me a truer sense of its scale or enormity, than the 45-minute drive around the perimeters of the site, and ultimately through the entire Park itself.
If the sheer scale of the Park is massively impressive, then the plethora of different interconnected works being carried out by what is currently a 3,000-strong workforce is even more so. From demolition to soil cleaning, to pipe laying, to establishing the foundations of the Olympic Stadium; with four years to go until the 2012 Games come to London it’s great to see that such a huge amount of work has already been completed.

While I’m sure it may sometimes be frustrating for local residents having to cope with the adverse side effects of such a vast construction project, the benefits that they will undoubtedly reap in the future are staggering.

There’s no way that such large-scale investment and improvements (transport links, the planned green spaces and parkland, job development, world-class leisure facilities, the list goes on...) would be even conceivable without the impetus of something as prestigious and gigantic as the Games.

I’m really intrigued to see how the site develops over the coming months and years and am sure that it’ll be a fascinating transformation to observe, especially for the staff and local residents who’ll be lucky enough to see the incremental changes.

Comments for this post:

  • 20 Aug 2008, 06:54PM, joshouttram said:

    I have looked at all the venues for the 2012 games and have just listened to Lord Coe's TV interview regarding the 2012 games and venues. I find it outrageous that we have decided to go with such a small games with our future in mind. The country should realise that we have to deliver something great, and to do that we need to present something as good or better than the recent games (Beijing, Athens and Sydney). Our venues are tiny compared to most games. We need to show the world how great GREAT Britain is, because at the moment we are destroying our pride.

  • 24 Aug 2008, 03:15PM, rherzig said:

    G'day. Well Bejing was good (a lot of ideas 'borrowed'from Sydney, Athens was OK now for London. I am expecting GREAT things from the UK. One thing is for certain the success of Sydney was that we used a large area with large infrastructure. We are still reaping the benefits. For London to be successful (and I have no doubt it will be) you need to think BIG!In essence I agree with joshouttram.

You must log in to comment.
July 2009
SMTWTFS
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031

June 2009